Ella Enchanted, by Gail Carson Levine

If I could trace the popularity of contemporary young adult fairy tale retellings, I might start with Gail Carson Levine’s Ella Enchanted. It might not be precisely the first retelling of a popular fantasy, but it is certainly ranked among the most well known. Like I mentioned in my Geekerella review, it is ridiculously easy to retell the Cinderella story, but the best ones bring their own twists and turns to create legitimate suspense and character. And certainly, Ella Enchanted cemented early in my mind as a retelling model.

IMG_5381

In a world filled with ogres, gnomes, fairies, and other such creatures, Ella of Frell has a cursed life. As a child, an impulsive and airheaded fairy named Lucinda gave her the “gift” of obedience. Whatever order Ella is given—no matter how trivial or even how dangerous—she must obey. This complicates things when she makes friends with the crown prince Charmont, and her widowed father marries a woman with two catty and greedy daughters. Ella has always wanted to break her curse, but she is now determined to find a way, since it could put her friends, and even her beloved homeland, in danger…

You either know Ella Enchanted because of the book, or the Anne Hathaway movie, and it’s probably the most apples-to-oranges adaptation there ever was. The two only share similarities in character names and the very title, so it’s futile to compare them. It is, in retrospect, a little disappointing that the movie differs so much from the book, because the book is so delightful. To watch Ella and Char play with a baby centaur or slide down stair rails would have been adorable to watch; a retread of the Shrek formula is okay, but what material there already was was just fine too.

Levine has crafted an excellent cast. Ella is clumsy and fiery, but still sweet and very smart. Her stepsisters, Hattie and Olive, are so much fun to hate. But, the romantic that I am, the sweetest and most fun scenes happen between Ella and Char. There is genuine warmth between them that I return to more than anything in the book. They’re both older teenagers, but they’re still playful and mirthful—still children, in some respects.

But Levine’s biggest strength, beyond writing compelling and fun characters, is her storytelling. The familiar Cinderella beats are all there, but it doesn’t truly become a Cinderella story till halfway through. That’s because Ella is a character in her own right; she goes to finishing school; she runs away and tames a few ogres; she spends some time with the forest elves—she has all these adventures before the balls happen. Plus, the conflict of living with an obedience curse is fun, uncharted territory. Which, then again, is probably the best word to describe the book: fun. While more recent fairy tale retellings strive to be dark and bloody, this one just strove to have a fun adventure dabbling in danger and romance.  Darkness is fine in moderation, but fairy tales can work just as well when they have more magic and mirth than blood and sex.

I’ll admit, the movie version of Ella Enchanted is a guilty pleasure, but the more satisfying version will always remain the book. It’s a never-ending cycle of childish, fantastical fun, and among one of Gail Carson Levine’s finest works—if among one of the greatest fairy tale retellings ever.

fairy-silhouette-vector-filefairy-silhouette-vector-filefairy-silhouette-vector-filefairy-silhouette-vector-filefairy-silhouette-vector-file

 

7 thoughts on “Ella Enchanted, by Gail Carson Levine

  1. Ella Enchanted is one of my all-time favorite books and one of my favorite retellings of Cinderella. I was looking forward to the movie when it came out, but it was such a massive disappointment because of all the changes made, especially the ones shoehorned in to piggyback off of Shrek’s popularity. The only thing I like about it is Anne Hathaway’s cover of “Somebody to Love”; it was a preview of those sweet pipes that would earn her an Oscar year’s later.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I remember reading your blog post where you mentioned how much you disliked the movie. As an adaptation of the book, it blows hard, but as a movie, it’s a rainy afternoon sort of distraction. I can definitely agree that they followed the “Shrek” formula without remorse, but yeah, Anne could definitely pull off that song. Not to mention that Hugh Dancy was a pretty cute Char.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Agreed, he’s cute and I did kind of like his character arc too. I don’t begrudge you for liking the movie. As much as I’d like to see it remade, I think the book might be adapted better as a mini-series. That way there’s more time to really capture how well-developed the world is and let the Cinderella aspects of the story flow in naturally like in the book. Look at how fantastic Good Omens turned out.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Oh, boy, yes! To see Ella’s extended adventures at the finishing school with Areida and the three balls with Ella’s different dresses! I’m for it! Especially to see the characters cast as their proper ages!
        (Side note: I’m probably the last person on the planet who has not seen “Good Omens,” but probably because I have not read the book. But I’ll take your word for it. Everyone I’ve talked to LOVED it!)

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Yes, there’s so much more I’d love to see!
        And yes, I highly recommend Good Omens, both the book and the series (though it’s easier to appreciate the series if you read the book first). Terry Pratchett would have been proud of how it turned out.

        Liked by 1 person

      4. Haha, my first thought when I saw the trailer for “Good Omens” was “David Tennant’s in it and it was written partially by Neil Gaiman? Sign me up!” Looks like I’m off to the library…

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment